Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:53

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Hillary thinks we must censor or "we lose total control". Why does she demand total control?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How or what is the best way to make a hot rail device? Anddd goooo 👀👀
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
UMG Says They Should Be Removed From Sara Rivers Lawsuit Against Diddy - TMZ
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
'Cheers' star's cause of death released - KING5.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Fiserv’s stock surges as it teams with Circle to join the stablecoin party - MarketWatch
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.